← All case studies
Real data Fire · Metro For: Metropolitan fire & emergency planners

Greater Brisbane: the same method, a different city

Re-running an analysis on a second city is the real test of whether a finding travels. EquiMap applied the identical method to Greater Brisbane, 239 communities and 244 Queensland Fire Department stations, to see whether Sydney’s pattern repeats.

239
communities analysed
90
fire stations (metro)
34
communities >5 km from a station
+0.3
equity gap, pattern is mixed / opposite
What EquiMap revealed
It doesn’t, and that is exactly the value. Brisbane shows a flatter, mixed pattern, with the genuine reach opportunities being bay islands and outer towns such as Moreton Island (26.8 km) and Kilcoy (25.2 km). Each city deserves its own measurement.

Explore the live map

Greater Brisbane communities coloured by equity gap, distance, or SEIFA profile, with real Queensland Fire Department stations. Click any area to explore.

Colour by
Basemap

The data, several ways

Brisbane’s distance-by-advantage gradient and the communities furthest from a station, a different shape from Sydney’s.

Why this matters

The headline lesson across two cities is simple: coverage equity can’t be assumed from one place to another. A conclusion that holds in Sydney looks different in Brisbane, because geography, history and growth differ.

For a planner, that’s reassuring, it means decisions can rest on the actual local picture, produced quickly from open data, rather than on national rules of thumb.

Method & data: Identical methodology to the Sydney study, re-run with Queensland Fire Department station locations and Greater Brisbane boundaries. Same open-data sources, same scoring, only the city changes. That repeatability is the platform’s core value.

Continue exploring

Every city tells its own story.

EquiMap measures your region as it actually is, not as a national average assumes it to be.

Start a conversation →